At that time, Wang Yipeng appointed deputy director of Zhabei District Education Bureau, in charge of infrastructure. With the director-he's Huangmeng Yuan (for accepting bribes was sentenced to 10 years) participated in the negotiations.
in the first instance verdict, Wang Yipeng appeal, denied the bribery. Counsel believes that Wang Yipeng guilty, because the king set up in January 2007, the stock accounts of memory and some 46 million, sources of funds legally can not be found linked to the crime.
□ Morning News reporter Zhao Lei
and Wang Yipeng confession of bribery, by the Commission for Discipline Inspection formed, and not that he had been subjected to Gong, to extract confessions.
Subsequently, Zhabei District Board of Education decision to 7500 million, bought the land use right here, and February 27, 2004, represented by the Wang Yipeng, and real estate companies have signed a land transfer contract , three times a year pay the full cost. And Wang Yipeng also help real estate development company has done a land relocation work. According to the relevant curriculum vitae shows, Wang Yipeng Although in April 2005 as a researcher take a back seat, but the verdict found that in May 2005 or June, at his office in North Henan, Wang Yipeng accept a separate Zhuang give him $ 500,000.
real estate companies are finding that the nature of the land for educational sites, commercial sites can not change, ready to transfer. At this point,[url=http://www.ugg-onlineoutlet.com/ugg-classic-mini-boots-c-25.html]UGG Classic Mini Boots[/url], Zhabei District Education Bureau is preparing to build a key vocational schools, to real estate companies to purchase land use rights.
Yesterday, the Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Procuratorate, adopted by the Second Branch of Shanghai rejected the appeal, upheld the view that the judgments of Wang Yipeng not inappropriate, legal proceedings, the court rejected Wang Yipeng final appeal and upheld the the original verdict.
profit real estate company after the Huang and Wang's
second branch in Shanghai's Procuratorate made the case from the filing, summons, detention, arrest, every interrogation, have synchronized audio and video recording,[url=http://www.ugg-onlineoutlet.com/ugg-classic-mini-boots-c-25.html]UGG Classic Mini Boots[/url], Wang Yipeng statement, the expression of natural, sincere, nature can not be questioned, investigators have found no confessions, Gong phenomenon.
identified based on the fact that the trial evidence, Wang Yipeng, Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court on the grounds of appeal and the views of both parties to be judged that the housing real estate companies use the money for a shareholder testimony, Zhuang was explained, to prove the whereabouts of the relevant cash bribes and Zhuang have the condition.
said the appeal was to extract confessions, Gong, completely retracted
Shanghai Municipal Procuratorate, the second branch that Wang bribery facts are clear, there is ample evidence, his grounds of appeal, does not hold.
63-year-old Wang Yipeng, Shanghai Zhabei District, former Under Secretary for Education, major in charge of infrastructure work. In 2005, he received a Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. Zhuang sent 50 million, the first instance court found that this constituted bribery and sentenced Wang Yipeng to 12 years imprisonment and confiscation of 100,000 yuan, the confiscation The restitution of the stolen money.
bribery Zhuang told counsel that the sick, poor memory, so the time for bribery, bribery is inconsistent statements, and how to access Wang Yipeng office, his office toward, furnishings, etc. can not remember . It does not follow overthrow Zhuang huge profits in the company, in order to thank Wang Yipeng 500,000 bribe testimony.
and real estate company had in January 2005 to September, to travel, cost of labor to extract the name of a total of 1.09 million yuan in cash, according to Wang Yipeng prosecution's statement on the whereabouts of stolen money, checking his stock related accounts, total deposit of $ 80 million, according to counsel to provide evidence of which 30 million is the king of the loan to others, the balance of just $ 500,000.
been confirmed, Wang Yipeng total of 15 bank cards,[url=http://www.ugg-onlineoutlet.com/ugg-classic-mini-boots-c-25.html]UGG Classic Mini Boots[/url], a securities account, of which 8 total consumption of industrial and commercial bank accounts amounting to 130 million yuan, balance of 39 million yuan, the stock market value of about 33 million, account for funds the amount of 7,000 yuan. Wang Yipeng handwritten confession shows that most of the stolen money into the Industrial and Commercial Bank of periodic or current account. Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court that the trial court cited evidence, reflect only in January 2007 after Wang Yipeng securities account changes in the large sums of money. The counsel also raised the securities account is only Wang Yipeng Industrial and Commercial Bank corresponding to part of the funds within the bank card from legitimate sources, and can not overturn Wang Yipeng whereabouts of the stolen money confession.
first instance jailed for 12 years, Wang Yipeng immediately appeal, he said,[url=http://www.ugg-onlineoutlet.com/ugg-classic-mini-boots-c-25.html]UGG Classic Mini Boots[/url], in the discipline , admitted taking bribes. In addition, the Court of First Instance did not identify the stolen money he deposited a record 500,000 yuan, and Zhuang testimony on the reasons for money, time, place, money, the content, no authenticity. Counsel is made, after the trial to produce evidence to prove Wang Yipeng the securities account of the legitimate sources of funds,[url=http://www.ugg-onlineoutlet.com/ugg-classic-mini-boots-c-25.html]UGG Classic Mini Boots[/url], not that it is the money.
thing goes back to May 2003, when a company had 68 million yuan of prices, the East China Normal University, No. 584 Baoshan purchased the right to use land and real estate development company founded As a project development company, Zhuang served as general manager of this real estate development company.
of Final Appeal dismissed the appeal and upheld the original verdict
Related articles：
没有评论:
发表评论