BEIJING, July 13, Leshan Electric (Liu Zhongjun Liang Chiung first) 13, a reporter from Sichuan Leshan City, Sandy Bay district court was informed that mediation with the employees affected by the compensation dispute finally ends, a defendant Haven Construction Company, defendant Lee came to the court a one-time compensation will be paid 150,000 yuan to the plaintiff Yang.
introduced, according to the court, the plaintiff Yang Jia Department of Agriculture Bay Area town of farmers, was introduced in early September 2009 to the cement plant construction site work. The project contractor for the construction of a construction company defendant Haven, construction company has subcontracted this work to the defendant Lee. At 12:30 on September 17, 2009 or so, the plaintiff returned to work after lunch Yang's office 5th floor, in a wood when removed, accidentally fell from the hole under the ground floor of wood, immediately rushed to hospital, defendant Yang advance advance the plaintiff's medical expenses of $ 8.5 million. January 19, 2010, the plaintiff's injury by the administration of justice for the four identified disability, the majority of dependent care needs.
2010 年 2 2, the plaintiff sued to Yang Bay Court for a construction company and the defendant Sandy Lee joint compensation for the loss of 63 million yuan. Case into the proceedings, the defendant because of two Bay Construction Company and a Yang Lee for the plaintiff's level of disability and care dependency of conclusions refused to accept the court for re-identification of Sandy Bay. Under the auspices of the court, jointly commissioned by the accreditation bodies, May 20,Moncler Online, 2010,UGG Outlet, Sichuan Huaxi forensic center to make the plaintiff's injury once again identified as four judicial disability, the majority of care-dependent conclusions.
Haven Court held a public hearing the case, the dispute focused on the case: whether the plaintiff's injury time during the lunch break? Whether due to work injury? Trial on the two sides engaged in a fierce debate, the plaintiff on the site that it is injured, the two defendants should bear the full liability. The two defendants that the plaintiff is non-working hours, non-work locations, the reasons for non-work injuries, should not bear any liability. The judge that: the plaintiff,UGG Sale UK, after all, is injured on a construction site, even if not for reasons of work, lunch break outside the workplace injury occurs, the defendant should bear the bear the relevant legal and social responsibility.
Haven Court Civil Court judges an all out, side to explain the analysis of legal liability to the plaintiff, compensation standards, to persuade the plaintiff to reduce the amount of compensation. Also pointed out that the two defendants, the plaintiff's injury, after all, is injured on a construction site, the second defendant, whether legal or moral point of view from both the plaintiff should be given some compensation. After a difficult mediation, the parties finally reached a settlement agreement, the second defendant, a construction company and Lee Bay co-plaintiff Yang compensation for the loss of a total of 15 million in civil mediation to receive one-time payment. (End)
Related articles：
没有评论:
发表评论